access to records, right of (HIPAA)

HIPAA's Privacy Rule grants every individual a "right of access" -- to inspect and obtain a copy of all protected health information within the designated record set maintained by the covered entity. (Such a right of access exists, in varying forms, under most but not all state law. HIPAA has made this requirement national.)

HIPAA's right of access excludes:

  • information compiled for use in a civil, criminal or administrative proceeding; and
  • information protected by the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments of 1988 (42 USC 263a, 42 CFR 493.3(a)(2)).

Covered entities can deny an individual's request for access, without providing an opportunity for appeal, in the following circumstances:

  • the information falls into one of the exclusion categories above;
  • the request comes from an inmate in a correctional institution, and access would endanger the health or safety of that person or anyone else in the facility;
  • the information is generated in the course of ongoing research, and disclosure would jeopardize the research (provided that the individual must have agreed to such a restriction previously, and access rights are restored at the conclusion of the protocol);
  • records containing the information are subject to federal Privacy Act protections (5 USC 552a);
  • the information was obtained from someone under a promise of confidentiality, and the access requested would be reasonably likely to reveal the source.

A denial of access is permissible, but with an opportunity to appeal, when a "licensed health care professional, in the exercise of professional judgment" determines that the requested access is "reasonably likely" to endanger the life or physical safety of, or cause substantial harm to, the individual or another person. Requests by a personal representative of an individual may be denied for the same reasons.

Note that institutions are to make a good faith effort only to deny access to the parts of the record that meet these denial grounds, while providing the rest. Because some information is "dangerous" or "tainted" does not mean that there are grounds for denial of the entire request.

(If the covered entity does not possess the information requested, but knows where it is maintained, the covered entity must inform the individual where to direct the request for access.)

A covered entity may require that individuals make their access requests in writing, but must inform individuals of this requirement in its Notice of Privacy Practices. It must respond to a request within 30 days of receiving it, either by providing the access specified or in a written response stating the reason(s) for denial. If the request is denied, the individual's right to seek review must also be outlined in the response.

Reviews of denials must be performed by a licensed health care professional who is designated by the covered entity to act as a reviewing official and who did not participate in the original decision to deny. The covered entity is bound by the reviewer's determination. Individuals may appeal the institution's determination by complaining to DHHS.

For information that is not maintained on site, nor otherwise in readily accessible form, a covered entity has up to 60 days to provide access if it does not deny the request.. (An additional 30-day extension is allowed, but a written explanation of the reasons for delay must be provided.)

Access must be provided at "a convenient time and place," or can be mailed to the individual. The scope, format, and other aspects of the request may be negotiated with the individual, as necessary to achieve timely access. Individuals can agree to a summary or explanation of information in lieu of the actual information

Reasonable, "cost-based" fees for preparations of summaries and explanations, copying and postage, etc., may be charged.

See also:

 
 

   © 2002-2006 Contributing authors and University of Miami School of Medicine