consent (HIPAA)

Under HIPAA's Privacy Rule, covered entities may optionally obtain a "consent" from patients for the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI) for treatment, payment or other health care operations (TPO).

The previous version of the Rule, under which consent was required, specified the components of and process for consent in considerable detail. Covered entities are now given "complete discretion" in designing consent mechanisms, if they choose to adopt one. (For example, each entity can decide for itself how it will handle the revocation of a consent, or a refusal to provide one in the first place.)

Note that though the terms are sometimes used interchangeably in common discourse, a consent is different from a HIPAA authorization. The latter is required to permit "extra" disclosures above and beyond TPO, e.g., for fundraising. A consent cannot be used to permit types of use or disclosure for which authorizations are mandated.

As a partial substitute, covered entities are now required to make a good faith effort to obtain written acknowledgment of receipt of the notice of privacy practices. Signing of an acknowledgment can provide the opportunity for discussion of an entity's information practices (that would have come when a consent was signed).

As with any other provision of HIPAA, the principle of preemption applies: States may impose consent requirements which provide stronger protections for medical and psychotherapeutic privacy. Indeed, most if not all states require consents for treatment and other purposes already, and covered entities may choose to include information use permission within such documents.

See also:

 
 

   © 2002-2006 Contributing authors and University of Miami School of Medicine