liberty, principle of

Freedom of human action, grounded in the principle of autonomy, consistent with the nature and dignity of human beings.

It is generally accepted that some liberties may be judiciously traded off for state protection via the law. As with the specification of justice, reasonable persons may differ markedly on the details of such liberty trade-offs, as may particular societies.

Rationales for the limitation of individual human liberties generally divide into those relating to the individual whose liberty is circumscribed versus those that relate to others:

  • the harm principle - to prevent harm to others;
  • the offense principle - to prevent offense to others;
  • legal moralism - to prevent immoral acts (which acts can be viewed as harming either the individual, society or both).

Philosophers who have taken a darker view of human beings (e.g., Hobbes), or who place a higher value on community (e.g., Rousseau) are inclined to opt for more circumscription of liberty than those who see liberty as pre-eminently important and humans as fundamentally rational, good-natured sorts. (John Locke and our own Founding Fathers are examples of the latter view.)

See also:

 
 

   © 2002-2006 Contributing authors and University of Miami School of Medicine