|
Privacy
Standard/Rule (HIPAA)
Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations
are divided into four Standards or Rules: (1) Privacy (discussed
here), (2) Security, (3)
Identifiers, and (4)
Transactions and
Code Sets.
The Privacy Rule
is the most complex of the four, setting standards for how
protected health information
(PHI) "in any form or medium" should be controlled.
(HIPAA's other rules cover only electronic information.) This
Rule took effect in April 2003 for large entities, and a year
later for small ones. (For details, see the HIPAA
compliance calendar.)
Privacy Rule protections
extend to every patient whose information is collected, used
or disclosed by covered entities. It imposes responsibilities
on the entire workforce
of a covered entity -- including all employees and volunteers
-- in order to secure those rights. It also requires contractual
assurances for any business
associates of health care institutions that handle health
care information on a covered entity's behalf.
States have many
laws and regulations that address health information. HIPAA
adds its protections to those the states provide. In most
cases, where state requirements are stricter they remain in
force; HIPAA does not preempt
them. Put differently, the Privacy Rule establishes a federal
floor for health privacy, but not a ceiling.
In its most visible
change, the
Privacy Rule requires covered entities to provide patients
with a Notice
of Privacy Practices. The Notice must describe, in general
terms, how organizations will protect health information,
and specify the patient's right to:
- gain
access to and, if desired, obtain a copy of his/her
own health records;
- request
corrections of errors that the patient finds (or include
the patient's statement of disagreement if the institution
believes the information is correct);
- receive
an accounting of how their information has been used
(including a list of the persons and institutions to whom/which
it has been disclosed);
- request
limits on access to, and additional protections for,
particularly sensitive information;
A copy of the Privacy
Notice must be provided the first time a patient sees a direct
treatment provider, and any time thereafter when requested.
On that first visit, treatment providers must also make a
good faith effort to obtain a written acknowledgement,
confirming that a copy of the Notice was obtained. Health
plans and insurers must also provide periodic Notices to their
customers, but do not need to secure any acknowledgement.
HIPAA requires
no other documentation from the patient to use or disclose
information for basic functions, like treatment
and payment, or for a broad range
of other core health
care operations. State laws may nonetheless require some
kind of consent/authorization form from the patient for these
purposes. (It is common for institutions to claim, incorrectly,
that HIPAA does.)
By contrast, the
Privacy Rule does require that patients sign a supplemental
authorization before information can be used for certain "extra"
purposes like research, or certain
kinds of marketing and fundraising.
Health care institutions cannot condition treatment or payment
for health care services on receiving a patient's authorization
for such supplemental uses.
The general approach
of the Rule beyond that is: If a person has a right to make
a health care decision, then he/she has the right to control
information associated with that decision. Children
and those who are incompetent may have decisions about both
health care and health information made by a personal
representative. (Typically, the personal representative
is the parent in the case of a child.)
HIPAA extends extra
protections for especially sensitive information -- notably
psychotherapy notes,
which require a supplemental authorization for release. Genetic
information issues are not yet addressed by HIPAA, nor
does HIPAA extend any special protections to HIV, substance
abuse or other information categories that often receive special
treatment in state law.
Although the Privacy
Rule is complicated (to put it mildly) it does have an overall
scheme for its protections:
- Uses for treatment,
payment and a long list of other routine health care operations
are covered by the "Notice" that patients acknowledge
receiving;
- A few particular
kinds of uses -- notably for research, marketing or fundraising
-- require a specific, separate written "authorization";
- A few others
require only an opportunity
to agree or object orally, but no consent or authorization
-- notably, this includes listing of patients in facility
directories, and disclosures to those involved in a
patient's care, such as family members. (It is common to
get written authorization for this too, though it is not
required.)
Beyond treatment,
payment and health care operations, there is another broad
category of uses and disclosures that are permitted without
patients' permission. This includes PHI uses and disclosures:
- for research,
without any authorization, where permitted by an IRB or
Privacy Board waiver;
- to avert a serious,
imminent threat to public safety;
- anything else
required by law.
Individuals would
be entitled to an accounting of (some of) these disclosures,
though that accounting might be temporarily suspended in certain
circumstances.
Over and above
all the categories, HIPAA imposes a very general rule on anyone
who deals with protected health information: collection, use
and disclosure should be no greater than necessary to complete
a work-related task. For obvious reasons, this is
called the minimum necessary
standard.
The minimum necessary
standard is partially waived for health practitioners engaged
in treatment -- it still applies to treatment uses,
but not to disclosures between/among practitioners.
The regulations relax the requirement in part to avoid any
possible interference in the daily practice of delivering
health care.
Health care facilities
are under an obligation to integrate a minimum necessary standard
into their policies and procedures. That includes administrative
rules as well as, where available, computer-enforced access
controls.
Every covered entity
must put in place general privacy
policies that reflect HIPAA's requirements, and, if they
are stricter, the requirements of state law. Those policies
must include sanctions for employees that violate them, including
termination for serious or repeated violations.
Institutions must
designate a privacy
officer, who will have the responsibility for enforcing
the regulations, as well as supervising (or handling directly)
the procedures to handle requests for information access,
corrections to records, accountings of disclosures, processing
complaints and so forth.
Institutions must
also, as noted, include privacy requirements in their contracts
with business associates. All
employees (and volunteers) must be educated
about privacy practices in a manner "appropriate"
to their job responsibilities.
HIPAA includes
substantial civil and criminal penalties for violations of
its provisions, ranging from $100 per violation up to $250,000
and 10 years in prison. The harshest penalties attend deliberate
misuse, particularly for sale or use of information for personal
gain, commercial advantage or malicious harm.
See also:
|